ArticleScientific reports2024
Tests of abnormal gaze behavior increase the accuracy of mild cognitive impairment assessments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual field-based reaction time as a novel indicator for early detection of mild cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantifying Mild Cognitive Impairments in Older Adults Using Multi-modal Wearable Sensor Data in a Kitchen Environment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Enhancing Mild Cognitive Impairment Auxiliary Identification Through Multimodal Cognitive Assessment with Eye Tracking and Convolutional Neural Network Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Deficits in reaching movements under visual interference as a novel diagnostic marker for mild cognitive impairment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Eye tracking as a diagnostic tool in Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and related dementias: a systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
- Cognitive function and eye movement patterns during reading tasks in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tests to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) should have high sensitivity and accuracy. Previously, we reported on a cognitive composition test (CCT) that we developed to detect MCI. In this study, we compared gaze behavior parameters, namely, gaze fixation duration and gaze-shift frequency, during the CCT in participants with MCI and healthy controls (HC) to determine whether these parameters would accurately detect MCI in older adults. Participants performed CCT-A, -B, and -C tasks with varying difficulty levels while wearing eye-tracking devices. Performance time, gaze fixation duration, and gaze-shift frequency were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the identification accuracy. The MCI group was significantly slower in completing the CCT-C task and had a higher gaze-shift frequency into both the sample object space and workspace than the HC group. Gaze fixation duration in the sample object space increased in the MCI group as the CCT became difficult. Our findings indicated that combining the CCT with performance time and gaze pattern improved the accuracy of distinguishing between individuals with and without MCI and that patients with MCI have abnormal gaze behavior during cognitive tasks. Therefore, evaluation of gaze parameters may improve the accuracy of identifying patients with MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.