ArticleANZ journal of surgery2024
Postoperative
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRarely, appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (NET) are an incidental finding when an appendicectomy is undertaken for suspected appendicitis. The role of further imaging in this setting is poorly defined. Positron emission tomography (PET) using
methodsWe reviewed 47 PET scans in 30 patients, undertaken from 2009 to 2018. Scintigraphic findings, histopathological characteristics of the initial appendiceal lesion and medical records were reviewed.
resultsMost patients (n = 15) had small (<10 mm) appendiceal NETs with low grade (Ki67 < 2%) features. Eight patients had tumours between 10 and 20 mm, and seven had tumours >20 mm. Goblet cell features were identified in two patients. Three positive PET scans were reported in one patient with an index tumour measuring 40 mm and Ki67 < 2%. The remaining 29 patients had 44 negative scans. Clinical outcome data were available in 27 patients (mean follow-up time 57 months; range 6-123 months). There was no evidence of recurrent neuroendocrine disease at the time of the last follow-up.
conclusionThese data indicate that in most cases, post-surgical
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.