Evidence mapPaperPMID 39177992Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Automatic Determination of Endothelial Cell Density From Donor Cornea Endothelial Cell Images.

Beth Ann M Benetz, Ved S Shivade, Naomi M Joseph, Nathan J Romig, John C McCormick, Jiawei Chen, Michael S Titus, Onkar B Sawant, Jameson M Clover, Nathan Yoganathan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Beth Ann M BenetzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ved S ShivadeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Naomi M JosephDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nathan J RomigDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John C McCormickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jiawei ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Michael S TitusEversight, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Onkar B SawantEversight, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jameson M CloverVisionGift, Portland, OR, USA.
Nathan YoganathanVisionGift, Portland, OR, USA.
Harry J MenegayDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Robert C O'BrienBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
David L WilsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jonathan H LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

CORNEAL DONOR STUDYU10EY012358 · JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · 1999 to 2005
$3.5M
Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 2025 to 2025
$307k
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · 1997 to 1997
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NEI NIH HHS U10 EY012358NEI NIH HHS U10 EY020798NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine endothelial cell density (ECD) from real-world donor cornea endothelial cell (EC) images using a self-supervised deep learning segmentation model. Methods: Two eye banks (Eversight, VisionGift) provided 15,138 single, unique EC images from 8169 donors along with their demographics, tissue characteristics, and ECD. This dataset was utilized for self-supervised training and deep learning inference. The Cornea Image Analysis Reading Center (CIARC) provided a second dataset of 174 donor EC images based on image and tissue quality. These images were used to train a supervised deep learning cell border segmentation model. Evaluation between manual and automated determination of ECD was restricted to the 1939 test EC images with at least 100 cells counted by both methods. Results: The ECD measurements from both methods were in excellent agreement with rc of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.79; P < 0.001) and bias of 123 cells/mm2 (95% CI, 114-131; P < 0.001); 81% of the automated ECD values were within 10% of the manual ECD values. When the analysis was further restricted to the cropped image, the rc was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.89; P < 0.001), bias was 46 cells/mm2 (95% CI, 39-53; P < 0.001), and 93% of the automated ECD values were within 10% of the manual ECD values. Conclusions: Deep learning analysis provides accurate ECDs of donor images, potentially reducing analysis time and training requirements. Translational Relevance: The approach of this study, a robust methodology for automatically evaluating donor cornea EC images, could expand the quantitative determination of endothelial health beyond ECD.

Indexed as

Endothelium, CornealTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountDeep LearningEye BanksFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39177992
PMCPMC11346145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.