ArticleScientific reports2024
Diagnosis of perimenopausal coronary heart disease patients using radiomics signature of pericoronary adipose tissue based on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of plaque progression using different machine learning models of pericoronary adipose tissue radiomics based on coronary computed tomography angiography.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Sex-Specific Characteristics of Perivascular Fat in Aortic Aneurysms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To assess whether the radiomics signature of pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can distinguish between perimenopausal women with coronary heart disease (CHD) and those without coronary artery disease (CAD). This single-center retrospective case-control study comprised 140 perimenopausal women with CHD presenting with chest pain who underwent CCTA within 48 h of admission. They were matched with 140 control patients presenting with chest pain but without CAD, based on age, risk factors, radiation dose and CT tube voltage. For all participants, PCAT around the proximal right coronary artery was segmented, from which radiomics features and the fat attenuation index (FAI) were extracted and analyzed. Subsequently, corresponding models were developed and internally validated using Bootstrap methods. Model performance was assessed through measures of identification, calibration, and clinical utility. Using logistic regression analysis, an integrated model that combines clinical features, fat attenuation index and radiomics parameters demonstrated enhanced discrimination ability for perimenopausal CHD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.740-0.845). This model outperformed both the combination of clinical features and PCAT attenuation (AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.602-0.727) and the use of clinical features alone (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.603-0.732). Calibration curves for the three predictive models indicated satisfactory fit (all p > 0.05). Moreover, decision curve analysis demonstrated that the integrated model offered greater clinical benefit compared to the other two models. The CCTA-based radiomics signature derived from the PCAT model outperforms the FAI model in differentiating perimenopausal CHD patients from non-CAD individuals. Integrating PCAT radiomics with the FAI could enhance the diagnostic accuracy for perimenopausal CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.