Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180242›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2024

Propagating pluripotency - The conundrum of self-renewal.

Austin Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Propagating pluripotency - The conundrum of self-renewal.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Relationship of PSC to embryos: Extending and refining capture of PSC lines from mammalian embryos.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Austin SmithLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3029-4682

Funding

European Research Council ERC AdG 835312Medical Research Council G1100526/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of mouse embryonic stem cells in 1981 transformed research in mammalian developmental biology and functional genomics. The subsequent generation of human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) and the development of molecular reprogramming have opened unheralded avenues for drug discovery and cell replacement therapy. Here, I review the history of PSCs from the perspective that long-term self-renewal is a product of the in vitro signaling environment, rather than an intrinsic feature of embryos. I discuss the relationship between pluripotent states captured in vitro to stages of epiblast in the embryo and suggest key considerations for evaluation of PSCs. A remaining fundamental challenge is to determine whether naïve pluripotency can be propagated from the broad range of mammals by exploiting common principles in gene regulatory architecture.

Indexed as

Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell Self RenewalCellular ReprogrammingEmbryonic Stem CellsGerm LayersHumansMiceembryogenesisembryonic stem cellsepiblastpluripotencyself‐renewalsignalingstem cells

Identifiers

PMID39180242
PMCPMC11589686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.