Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180325›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

CLOVER (CLOstridium difficile Vaccine Efficacy tRial) Study: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of a Detoxified Toxin A/B Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older at Increased Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Curtis J Donskey, Erik R Dubberke, Nicola P Klein, Elizabeth G Liles, Katarzyna Szymkowiak, Mark H Wilcox, Jody Lawrence, Salim Bouguermouh, Haiying Zhang, Kenneth Koury and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03090191 (A PHASE 3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLINDED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND TOLERABILITY OF A CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE VACCINE IN ADULTS 50 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03090191 phase3completednot on this map

A phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a clostridium difficile vaccine in adults 50 years of age and older

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2017 to 2021Enrolled17,535ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsClostridium difficile vaccine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Clostridioides difficile pathogenesis and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Trends and Impact ofGastroenterology research · 2026
    Article
  13. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of theThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Mouse monoclonal antibodies againstInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  16. AgainstToxins · 2025
    Review
  17. Management of severe and fulminantJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Navigating recurrentAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  19. Mechanisms ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  20. A Review of Therapies forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Curtis J DonskeyGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Erik R DubberkeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Nicola P KleinKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Elizabeth G LilesKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Katarzyna SzymkowiakClinical Research, Synexus Polska Sp. z.o.o., Wroclaw, Poland.
Mark H WilcoxLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Jody LawrencePfizer, Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Salim BouguermouhPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Haiying ZhangPfizer, Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kenneth KouryPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Ruth BaileyPfizer, Ltd, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Helen M SmithPfizer, Ltd, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Stephen LockhartPfizer, Ltd, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Erik LamberthPfizer, Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Warren V KalinaPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Michael W PridePfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Chris WebberPfizer, Ltd, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Annaliesa S AndersonPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Kathrin U JansenPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
William C GruberPfizer, Inc, Pearl River, New York, USA.
Nicholas KitchinPfizer, Ltd, Hurley, United Kingdom.

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridioides difficile infection (CDI) causes substantial mortality and healthcare burden. We assessed the detoxified toxin-A/B PF-06425090 vaccine for primary CDI prevention.

methodsThis phase 3 observer-blinded study randomized (1:1) ≥50-year-olds at increased CDI risk (N = 17 535) to receive 3 PF-06425090 or placebo doses (0, 1, and 6 months). Primary end points were first CDI episode (≥3 unformed stools within 24 hours; central laboratory-confirmed toxin A/B positive) ≥14 days post-dose 3 (PD3; first primary) and post-dose 2 (PD2; second primary). CDI duration, need for CDI-related medical attention (secondary end points), and antibiotic use (post hoc analysis) PD3 were evaluated. Tolerability and safety were assessed.

resultsThe primary end point was not met (17 PF-06425090 and 25 placebo recipients had first CDI episode ≥14 days PD3 [vaccine efficacy (VE) = 31.0% (96.4% confidence interval [CI], -38.7% to 66.6%)]; 24 PF-06425090 and 34 placebo recipients had first CDI episode ≥14 days PD2 [VE = 28.6% (96.4% CI, -28.4% to 61.0%)]. Median CDI duration was lower with PF-06425090 (1 day) versus placebo (4 days; 2-sided nominal P = .02). Of participants with first CDI episode, 0 PF-06425090 and 11 placebo recipients sought CDI-related medical attention (post hoc analysis estimated VE = 100%; 95% CI, 59.6% to 100.0%) and 0 PF-06425090 and 10 placebo recipients required antibiotic treatment (VE = 100%; 95% CI, 54.8% to 100.0%). Local reactions were more frequent in PF-06425090 recipients, and systemic events were generally similar between groups; most were mild to moderate. Adverse event rates were similar between groups.

conclusionsThree PF-06425090 doses were safe and well tolerated. Although the primary end point was not met, PF-06425090 reduced symptom duration, CDI that required medical attention, and CDI-directed antibiotic treatment, highlighting its potential to reduce CDI-associated healthcare burden. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03090191.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial ProteinsEnterotoxinsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesEnterotoxinstcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficileadultsClostridioides difficileClostridioides difficile infectioninfectious diseasevaccine

Identifiers

PMID39180325
PMCPMC11650871

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.