Evidence mapPaperPMID 39180340Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

What Does 'Preconception Health' Mean to People? A Public Consultation on Awareness and Use of Language.

Danielle Schoenaker, Olatundun Gafari, Elizabeth Taylor, Jennifer Hall, Caroline Barker, Barney Jones, Nisreen A Alwan, Daniella Watson, Chandni Maria Jacob, Mary Barker and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The limits of preconception care for global health.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Danielle SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7652-990X
Olatundun GafariNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Elizabeth TaylorNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Jennifer HallInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Caroline BarkerNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Barney JonesWessex Public Involvement Network, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Nisreen A AlwanNIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Daniella WatsonInstitute for Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Chandni Maria JacobSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Mary BarkerMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Keith M GodfreySchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Emily ReasonPublic contributor, UK.
Finlay ForderPublic contributor, UK.
Judith StephensonInstitute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
UK Preconception Partnership

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4This project and OG were funded through a Development Funding award from the University of Southampton Public Engagement with Research unit and a New Things Fund award from Public Policy Southampton. DS is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) through an NIHR Advanced Fellowship (NIHR302955) and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203319). KMG is supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12011/4), the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR Senior Investigator [NF-SI-0515-10042] and NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre [NIHR203319]) and Alzheimer's Research UK (ARUK-PG2022A-008). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is growing scientific and policy recognition that optimising health before a potential pregnancy (preconception health) improves reproductive outcomes and the lifelong health of future children. However, public awareness on this topic is low. We conducted a public consultation to develop language recommendations and identify and prioritise approaches to inform research and improve public awareness of preconception health.

methodsA public consultation was undertaken with people of any gender aged 18-50 years living in the United Kingdom who were not currently expecting a child. Public contributors were recruited through patient and public involvement, community and support groups, an existing cohort study, and an LGBTQ+ charity. An initial round of online group discussions (February/March 2021) explored public contributors' knowledge of preconception health, their recommendations for appropriate language, and ideas about public health approaches. In a subsequent discussion round (May 2021), language recommendations were refined and suggested approaches prioritised. Discussions were summarised based on notes taken by two researchers.

resultsFifty-four people joined the initial discussion round (66% women, 21% men, 13% nonbinary or transgender; 55% aged 18-30 years, 30% 31-40 years, 15% 41-50 years). Of these, 36 people (67%) participated in the subsequent round. Very few had heard the term 'preconception health', understood what it means, or why and for whom it is important. They recommended avoiding unfamiliar terms without further explanation (e.g., preconception health, medical terms), using language that is positive, encouraging and gender-sensitive where possible, and using messages that are specific, nonjudgmental and realistic. The phrases 'health and well-being during the childbearing years', 'health and well-being before pregnancy and parenthood' and 'planning for parenthood' resonated with most public contributors. School-based education, social media campaigns and the National Health Service emerged as priority approaches/settings for raising awareness.

conclusionThis public consultation produced recommendations from a diverse group of people of reproductive age in the United Kingdom to improve language and prioritise approaches that increase public understanding of preconception health in ways that are relevant and appropriate to them. This should begin in schools and will require adaptation of curricula, alongside co-development of public awareness campaigns and guidance for healthcare professionals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This public consultation included a diverse group of members of the public. They were not involved in the original design of the project, but following the initial round of online group discussions, they contributed to the interpretation and refinement of the emerging concepts in a subsequent round of group meetings. After the consultation activity, public contributors formed a Public Advisory Group and have subsequently been involved in other studies on the same topic. Two public contributors (E.R. and F.F.) provided critical input in the preparation and revision of this manuscript and are co-authors of the paper.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePreconception CareAdolescentAdultAwarenessFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyUnited KingdomYoung Adultlanguagepreconception healthpublic awarenesspublic consultationpublic involvement

Identifiers

PMID39180340
PMCPMC11344208

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.