Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180366›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Video capsule endoscopy findings in dogs with chronic enteropathy and in healthy dogs.

Johanna Holmberg, Ingrid Ljungvall, Lena Pelander, Alice Defarges, Jenny Stiller, Jessica Ingman, Caroline Harlos, Thomas Spillmann, Jens Häggström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johanna HolmbergSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7340-6271
Ingrid LjungvallSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6617-0454
Lena PelanderSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9865-312X
Alice DefargesThe University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-3175
Jenny StillerLakeshore Animal Health Partners, Mississauga, Canada.
Jessica IngmanSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Caroline HarlosAnicura Albano Animal Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas SpillmannThe University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jens HäggströmSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3402-023X

Funding

Carenet 2020.4.1-4652Skogsborg's Research Foundation 25173801Sveland's Research Foundation 25172801Thure F och Karin Forsbergs Stiftelse 2020-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVideo capsule endoscopy is a noninvasive technique for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract.

objectiveTo investigate the safety of using the video capsule ALICAM in dogs with chronic enteropathy (CE) >10 kg, and to compare macroscopic gastrointestinal morphology between CE dogs and healthy controls (HC). ANIMALS: Fifteen CE dogs and 15 similarly breed, age and body weight matched HC.

methodsAll dogs underwent a clinical work up including blood analyses, fecal samples, abdominal ultrasonographic examination, and blood pressure measurement. The dogs were withheld from food for 16 hours before and 8 hours after they PO received an ALICAM. All recordings were quality assessed, and blindly evaluated by 2 trained observers.

resultsThe median age of CE dogs and HC was 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.5-5.9) years and 4.7 (IQR 3.3-5.6) years, respectively. The median body weight in the CE dogs and HC was 25.9 (IQR 20.6-30.9) kg, and 29 (IQR 16.2-30.5) kg, respectively. Complete recordings of the gastrointestinal tract were obtained from all dogs without complications. No significant differences were found between groups regarding number of abnormalities such as irregular mucosa, erythema, nonbleeding erosions, bleeding erosions, and dilated lacteals, as well as severity and extent of the abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The use of ALICAM for evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract in CE dogs and HC seems safe and feasible regarding gastrointestinal transit and macroscopic morphology assessment in dogs >10 kg. Abnormalities were found in similar proportions in CE dogs and HC.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyDog DiseasesAnimalsCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseDogsFemaleIntestinal DiseasesMaleALICAMcaninegastrointestinal diseasesmall intestine

Identifiers

PMID39180366
PMCPMC11423467

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.