Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39180564›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

The comparison of 2D and 3D systems in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Can Tercan, Ali Can Gunes, Ercan Bastu, Christophe Blockeel, Fatih Aktoz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Can TercanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Can GunesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mamak State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ercan BastuNesta Women's Health and Fertility Centre, Istanbul, Turkey.
Christophe BlockeelBrussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Fatih AktozBrussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. fatihaktoz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3210-849X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the existing evidence regarding the comparison between 2 and 3D systems in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) in terms of surgical outcomes.

methodsA systematic review of electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science, was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing 2D and 3D systems in TLH. The search employed a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to the topic. Studies meeting predefined criteria were included, while case reports and studies not directly comparing 2D and 3D systems were excluded. Two independent reviewers evaluated study eligibility and performed quality assessment. The quantitative synthesis was conducted using meta-analysis techniques.

resultsA statistically significant longer operation time in the 2D group compared to the 3D group (7 studies, mean difference [MD]: 13.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.35-18.00, I

conclusionOur results revealed a significant difference favoring 3D systems in operation time, while clinical outcomes between the two systems were found to be comparable in TLH. However, further research, particularly prospective studies with larger cohorts and longer-term follow-up, along with economic analyses, is needed to provide clinicians and healthcare decision-makers with essential guidance for practice and resource allocation.

Indexed as

HysterectomyLaparoscopyOperative TimeBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeBlood lossComplicationsOperation timeThree-dimensionalTotal laparoscopic hysterectomyTwo-dimensional

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.