Evidence mapPaperPMID 39180605Full record

ReviewMetabolic brain disease2024

Genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Tikam Chand Dakal, Ganesh S Kakde, Pawan Kumar Maurya

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tikam Chand Dakal *Genome and Computational Biology Lab, Mohanlal Sukhadia, University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, 313001, India. tikam26070@gmail.com.
Ganesh S Kakde *Department of Biochemistry, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, Haryana, India.
Pawan Kumar MauryaDepartment of Biochemistry, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh, 123031, Haryana, India. pkmaurya@cuh.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mostly aggressive and extremely malignant type of central nervous system is Glioblastoma (GBM), which is characterized by an extremely short average survival time of lesser than 16 months. The primary cause of this phenomenon can be attributed to the extensively altered genome of GBM, which is characterized by the dysregulation of numerous critical signaling pathways and epigenetics regulations associated with proliferation, cellular growth, survival, and apoptosis. In light of this, different genetic alterations in critical signaling pathways and various epigenetics regulation mechanisms are associated with GBM and identified as distinguishing markers. Such GBM prognostic alterations are identified in PI3K/AKT, p53, RTK, RAS, RB, STAT3 and ZIP4 signaling pathways, metabolic pathway (IDH1/2), as well as alterations in epigenetic regulation genes (MGMT, CDKN2A-p16

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticGlioblastomaTranscriptomeEpigenomicsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansMutationSignal TransductionBrain CancerEpigenetics/ EpigenomicsGenomicsGlioblastomaGliomaSignaling pathway

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.