ReviewArchives of dermatological research2024
Improving hidradenitis suppurativa management: consensus statements from physicians and patients' perspectives.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Modalities of Combined Medical and Surgical Treatment in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Criteria for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Competence Centers.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Secukinumab Efficacy Predictors in Korean Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A 48-Week Clinical Trial Analysis.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a frequent chronic inflammatory skin condition primarily affecting areas rich in apocrine sweat glands, presenting with comedones, papules, nodules, and abscesses, as well as tunnels and hypertrophic scarring. Despite its prevalence and impact on quality of life, the pathogenesis of HS remains incompletely understood. Notably, its diagnosis often suffers from delays and misidentification, therefore an improved education for healthcare providers is mandatory. Moreover, HS is frequently associated with systemic comorbidities and a multidisciplinary approach is suggested for its management. Recognizing these challenges, a group of Italian HS experts and patients convened to develop consensus guidelines via the Nominal Group Technique. Through iterative meetings and remote collaboration, they identified key areas for improvement and formulated consensus statements to guide healthcare providers in delivering optimal care. This collaborative effort highlights the importance of standardized approaches and interdisciplinary collaboration in managing HS effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.