ArticleCommunications biology2024
Improving genetic risk modeling of dementia from real-world data in underrepresented populations.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of large language models and conventional machine learning in postoperative outcome prediction: a retrospective, multi-national development and validation study.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Plasma ATN biomarkers across the alzheimer's disease continuum in a Chilean community- and clinic-based cohort.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- A common 19 bp APOE enhancer deletion is protective against Alzheimer's disease in African Americans.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence with Global Genomic Resources: A Narrative Review of Implications for Precision Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Multi-task learning identifies shared genetic risk for late-onset epilepsy and alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fair positive unlabeled learning for predicting undiagnosed Alzheimer's disease in diverse electronic health records.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- A Meta-Narrative Review of Channelopathies and Cannabis: Mechanistic, Epidemiologic, and Forensic Insights into Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Improving genetic risk modeling of dementia from real-world data in underrepresented populations.Communications biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic risk modeling for dementia offers significant benefits, but studies based on real-world data, particularly for underrepresented populations, are limited. We employ an Elastic Net model for dementia risk prediction using single-nucleotide polymorphisms prioritized by functional genomic data from multiple neurodegenerative disease genome-wide association studies. We compare this model with APOE and polygenic risk score models across genetic ancestry groups (Hispanic Latino American sample: 610 patients with 126 cases; African American sample: 440 patients with 84 cases; East Asian American sample: 673 patients with 75 cases), using electronic health records from UCLA Health for discovery and the All of Us cohort for validation. Our model significantly outperforms other models across multiple ancestries, improving the area-under-precision-recall curve by 31-84% (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value <0.05) and the area-under-the-receiver-operating characteristic by 11-17% (DeLong test p-value <0.05) compared to the APOE and the polygenic risk score models. We identify shared and ancestry-specific risk genes and biological pathways, reinforcing and adding to existing knowledge. Our study highlights the benefits of integrating functional mapping, multiple neurodegenerative diseases, and machine learning for genetic risk models in diverse populations. Our findings hold potential for refining precision medicine strategies in dementia diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.