Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183345›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of obesity (2005)2024

Prolonged latency of the gustatory evoked potentials for sucrose solution in subjects living with obesity compared with normal-weight subjects.

Thomas Mouillot, Marie-Claude Brindisi, Cyril Gauthier, Sophie Barthet, Clémence Quere, Djihed Litime, Manon Perrignon-Sommet, Sylvie Grall, Fabienne Lienard, Claire Fenech and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of obesity (2005), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Thomas MouillotCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France. thomas.mouillot@u-bourgogne.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-3035
Marie-Claude BrindisiCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Cyril GauthierEspace Médical Nutrition et Obésité, Ramsay Santé, Valmy medical center, 21000, Dijon, France.
Sophie BarthetCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Clémence QuereCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Djihed LitimeCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Manon Perrignon-SommetCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Sylvie GrallCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Fabienne LienardCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Claire FenechCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Hervé DevilliersClinical Investigation Center, CHU F. Mitterrand, 21000, Dijon, France.
Alexia RoulandEndocrinology and Diabetology Department, CHU F. Mitterrand, 21000, Dijon, France.
Marjolaine GeorgesCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Luc PenicaudRESTORE, UMR INSERM 1301, CNRS 5070, University of Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier, EFS, ENVT, 31432, Toulouse, France.
Laurent BrondelCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-014X
Corinne LeloupCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.
Agnès Jacquin-PiquesCenter for Taste and Feeding Behaviour (CSGA), UMR CNRS 6265, INRAE 1324, Université de Bourgogne, L'institut Agro Dijon, 21000, Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA difference in cortical treatment of taste information could alter food intake promoting the development of obesity. The main purpose was to compare, in subjects living with obesity (OB) and normal-weight subjects (NW), the characteristics of gustatory evoked potentials (GEP) for sucrose solution (10 g.100 mL

methodsEach subject had 2 randomized sessions spaced by an interval of 2 days. During one session, subjects were fasting and during the other, subjects took a lunch low in sugar. In each session, subjects had a blood test before a first GEP recording followed by a second GEP recording either after a lunch (feeding session) or no lunch (fasting session).

resultsTwenty-eight OB (BMI: 38.6 ± 9.0 kg.m

conclusionsThis study highlights a slower activation in the taste cortex in OB compared with NW.

Indexed as

ObesitySucroseAdultEvoked PotentialsFemaleGhrelinHumansMaleMiddle AgedTasteGhrelinSucrose

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.