Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183719›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2024

The Genetic Architecture of Recombination Rates is Polygenic and Differs Between the Sexes in Wild House Sparrows (Passer domesticus).

John B McAuley, Bertrand Servin, Hamish A Burnett, Cathrine Brekke, Lucy Peters, Ingerid J Hagen, Alina K Niskanen, Thor Harald Ringsby, Arild Husby, Henrik Jensen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John B McAuleyInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-1926-5284
Bertrand ServinGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan 31326, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-0913
Hamish A BurnettCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1868-4944
Cathrine BrekkeInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5532-9255
Lucy PetersGénétique Physiologie et Systèmes d'Elevage (GenPhySE), Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan 31326, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-1493
Ingerid J HagenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-3940
Alina K NiskanenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-2718
Thor Harald RingsbyCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-7592
Arild HusbyEvolutionary Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75236, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1911-8351
Henrik JensenCentre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 7491, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7804-1564
Susan E JohnstonInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5623-8902

Funding

Research Council of Norway 221956Royal Society RGF/R1/180090Royal Society University Research Fellowship UF150448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination through chromosomal crossing-over is a fundamental feature of sex and an important driver of genomic diversity. It ensures proper disjunction, allows increased selection responses, and prevents mutation accumulation; however, it is also mutagenic and can break up favorable haplotypes. This cost-benefit dynamic is likely to vary depending on mechanistic and evolutionary contexts, and indeed, recombination rates show huge variation in nature. Identifying the genetic architecture of this variation is key to understanding its causes and consequences. Here, we investigate individual recombination rate variation in wild house sparrows (Passer domesticus). We integrate genomic and pedigree data to identify autosomal crossover counts (ACCs) and intrachromosomal allelic shuffling (r¯intra) in 13,056 gametes transmitted from 2,653 individuals to their offspring. Females had 1.37 times higher ACC, and 1.55 times higher r¯intra than males. ACC and r¯intra were heritable in females and males (ACC h2 = 0.23 and 0.11; r¯intra  h2 = 0.12 and 0.14), but cross-sex additive genetic correlations were low (rA = 0.29 and 0.32 for ACC and r¯intra). Conditional bivariate analyses showed that all measures remained heritable after accounting for genetic values in the opposite sex, indicating that sex-specific ACC and r¯intra can evolve somewhat independently. Genome-wide models showed that ACC and r¯intra are polygenic and driven by many small-effect loci, many of which are likely to act in trans as global recombination modifiers. Our findings show that recombination rates of females and males can have different evolutionary potential in wild birds, providing a compelling mechanism for the evolution of sexual dimorphism in recombination.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticSparrowsAnimalsCrossing Over, GeneticFemaleMaleMultifactorial Inheritancecrossover countGWASpolygenicquantitative geneticsrecombinationwild population

Identifiers

PMID39183719
PMCPMC11385585

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.