Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39183948›Full record

ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2024

Effect of vaccinations and school restrictions on the spread of COVID-19 in different age groups in Germany.

Christiane Dings, Dominik Selzer, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Eva Möhler, Markus Wenning, Thomas Gehrke, Ulf Richter, Alexandra Nonnenmacher, Folke Brinkmann, Tobias Rothoeft and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Christiane DingsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Dominik SelzerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Nicola Luigi BragazziDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Eva MöhlerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Saarland University Hospital, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Markus WenningMedical Association, Westfalen-Lippe, 48151, Münster, Germany.
Thomas GehrkeMedical Association, Westfalen-Lippe, 48151, Münster, Germany.
Ulf RichterSchool of Education and Psychology, Siegen University, 57072, Siegen, Germany.
Alexandra NonnenmacherSchool of Education and Psychology, Siegen University, 57072, Siegen, Germany.
Folke BrinkmannUniversity Children's Hospital, Ruhr University, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias RothoeftUniversity Children's Hospital, Ruhr University, 44791, Bochum, Germany.
Michael ZemlinDepartment of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Hospital, 66421, Homburg, Germany.
Thomas LückeMedical Association, Westfalen-Lippe, 48151, Münster, Germany.
Thorsten LehrDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123, Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, various non-pharmaceutical interventions were adopted to control virus transmission, including school closures. Subsequently, the introduction of vaccines mitigated not only disease severity but also the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This study leveraged an adapted SIR model and non-linear mixed-effects modeling to quantify the impact of remote learning, school holidays, the emergence of Variants of Concern (VOCs), and the role of vaccinations in controlling SARS-CoV-2 spread across 16 German federal states with an age-stratified approach. Findings highlight a significant inverse correlation (Spearman's ρ = -0.92, p < 0.001) between vaccination rates and peak incidence rates across all age groups. Model-parameter estimation using the observed number of cases stratified by federal state and age allowed to assess the effects of school closure and holidays, considering adjustments for vaccinations and spread of VOCs over time. Here, modeling revealed significant (p < 0.001) differences in the virus's spread among pre-school children (0-4), children (5-11), adolescents (12-17), adults (18-59), and the elderly (60+). The transition to remote learning emerged as a critical measure in significantly reducing infection rates among children and adolescents (p < 0.001), whereas an increased infection risk was noted among the elderly during these periods, suggesting a shift in infection networks due to altered caregiving roles. Conversely, during school holiday periods, infection rates among adolescents mirrored those observed when schools were open. Simulation exercises based on the model provided evidence that COVID-19 vaccinations might serve a dual purpose: they protect the vaccinated individuals and contribute to the broader community's safety.

Indexed as

AgeCOVID-19Mathematical modelingNon-pharmaceutical interventionsVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39183948
PMCPMC11342094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.