Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184362›Full record

ArticleACS measurement science au2024

Impedimetric Measurement of Exchange Currents and Ionic Diffusion Coefficients in Individual Pseudocapacitive Nanoparticles.

Brian Roehrich, Lior Sepunaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS measurement science au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian RoehrichDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Lior SepunaruDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4716-5035

Funding

Bioelectrochemistry at the Nanoscale: Fundamentals and ApplicationsR35GM142920 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI SEPUNARU, LIOR · 2021 to 2025
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among electroanalytical techniques, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) offers the unique advantage of a high degree of frequency resolution. This enables EIS to readily deconvolute between the capacitive, resistive, and diffusional processes that underlie electrochemical devices. Here, we report the measurement of impedance spectra of individual, pseudocapacitive nanoparticles. We chose Prussian blue as our model system, as it couples an electron-transfer reaction with sodium ion intercalation-processes which, while intrinsically convoluted, can be readily resolved using EIS. We used a scanning electrochemical cell microscope (SECCM) to isolate single Prussian blue particles in a microdroplet and measured their impedance spectra using the multi-sine, fast Fourier transform technique. In doing so, we were able to extract the exchange current density and sodium ion diffusivity for each particle, which respectively inform on their electronic and ionic conductivities. Surprisingly, these parameters vary by over an order of magnitude between particles and are not correlated to particle size nor to each other. The implication of this apparent heterogeneity is that in a hypothetical battery cathode, one active particle may transfer electrons 10 times faster than its neighbor; another may suffer from sluggish sodium ion transport and have restricted charging rate capabilities compared to a better-performing particle elsewhere in the same electrode. Our results inform on this intrinsic heterogeneity while demonstrating the utility of EIS in future single-particle studies.

Identifiers

PMID39184362
PMCPMC11342456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.