Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39184469›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Determination of Fertility Hormones and Adipokines by LC-MRM/MS Analysis.

Anna Illiano, Gabriella Pinto, Amelia Mallardo, Chiara Melchiorre, Stefania Serpico, Marco Varelli, Stefania Fasano, Francesca di Rella, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Gaetano Buonfanti and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna IllianoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-8966
Gabriella PintoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9169-3452
Amelia MallardoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Chiara MelchiorreDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Stefania SerpicoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.
Marco VarelliIstituto Varelli, Via Cornelia dei Gracchi, 65, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Stefania FasanoIstituto Varelli, Via Cornelia dei Gracchi, 65, 80126 Napoli, Italy.
Francesca di RellaExperimental and Clinical Senologic Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CampitielloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction, ASL Salerno, 84124 Salerno, Italy.
Gaetano BuonfantiClinical Trial Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9301-0747
Angela AmoresanoDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Cinthia 26, 80126 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the increase in the rate of male and female infertility, assisted fertilization practices are currently adopted as valid support for couples unable to get pregnant. Analytical approaches for fertility hormone dosages are constantly being developed, following the technological progress of fertilization methods that have evolved for more than a century. Indeed, the analysis of fertility hormones in serum samples is a common clinical practice to check the fertility state, but absolute quantification of these hormones is a great challenge due to biological variability and low serum concentrations. Currently, ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) based methods are the most used analytical techniques to quantify hormones in blood in clinical settings. The current Article discusses the development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) to monitor multiple fertility hormones of a protein nature in a single chromatographic run, i.e., LH (luteinizing hormone), FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), TSH (thyroid-stimulating hormone), AMH (anti-Müllerian hormone), adiponectin, ghrelin, leptin, glucagon, and obestatin. Particular attention has been paid to the AMH hormone, whose ELISA-based quantification is known to be controversial due to the poor reproducibility between the various kits used. For AMH, the internal standard method was used for the quantitative determination to compare mass spectrometry data to the ELISA assays performed by an accredited analysis laboratory on a cohort of samples from women aged between 18 and 60 years. The ability to monitor multiple transitions by LC-MRM/MS ensured both high specificity and high selectivity, which is necessary for the quantification of protein and steroid hormones, besides improvements in data reproducibility and reduced analysis times and costs.

Identifiers

PMID39184469
PMCPMC11339818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.