Evidence mapPaperPMID 39184546Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer and translational biomedicine.

Hao Yuan, Christopher A Mancuso, Kayla Johnson, Ingo Braasch, Arjun Krishnan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao YuanGenetics and Genome Science Program; Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program, Michigan State University.ORCID 0000-0002-8848-1595
Christopher A MancusoDepartment of Biostatistics & Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.ORCID 0000-0003-3081-2758
Kayla JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-5705
Ingo BraaschDepartment of Integrative Biology; Genetics and Genome Science Program; Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program, Michigan State University.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-611X
Arjun KrishnanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus.ORCID 0000-0002-7980-4110

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128765NIH HHS R01 OD011116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research organisms provide invaluable insights into human biology and diseases, serving as essential tools for functional experiments, disease modeling, and drug testing. However, evolutionary divergence between humans and research organisms hinders effective knowledge transfer across species. Here, we review state-of-the-art methods for computationally transferring knowledge across species, primarily focusing on methods that utilize transcriptome data and/or molecular networks. We introduce the term "agnology" to describe the functional equivalence of molecular components regardless of evolutionary origin, as this concept is becoming pervasive in integrative data-driven models where the role of evolutionary origin can become unclear. Our review addresses four key areas of information and knowledge transfer across species: (1) transferring disease and gene annotation knowledge, (2) identifying agnologous molecular components, (3) inferring equivalent perturbed genes or gene sets, and (4) identifying agnologous cell types. We conclude with an outlook on future directions and several key challenges that remain in cross-species knowledge transfer.

Identifiers

PMID39184546
PMCPMC11343225

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.