ArticleCureus2024
Enhancing Clinical Diagnosis With Convolutional Neural Networks: Developing High-Accuracy Deep Learning Models for Differentiating Thoracic Pathologies.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The use of computational technology in medicine has allowed for an increase in the accuracy of clinical diagnosis, reducing errors through additional layers of oversight. Artificial intelligence technologies present the potential to further augment and expedite the accuracy, quality, and efficiency at which diagnosis can be made when used as an adjunctive tool. Such techniques, if found to be accurate and reliable in their diagnostic acuity, can be implemented to foster better clinical decision-making, improving patient quality of care while reducing healthcare costs. Methodology This study implemented convolution neural networks to develop a deep learning model capable of differentiating normal chest X-rays from those indicating pneumonia, tuberculosis, cardiomegaly, and COVID-19. There were 3,063 normal chest X-rays, 3,098 pneumonia chest X-rays, 2,920 COVID-19 chest X-rays, 2,214 chest X-rays, and 554 tuberculosis chest X-rays from Kaggle that were used for training and validation. The model was trained to recognize patterns within the chest X-rays to efficiently recognize these diseases within patients to be treated on time. Results The results indicated a success rate of 98.34% incorrect detections, exemplifying a high degree of accuracy. There are limitations to this study. Training models require hundreds to thousands of samples, and due to potential variability in image scanning equipment and techniques from which the images are sourced, the model could have learned to interpret external noise and unintended details which can adversely impact accuracy. Conclusions Further studies that implement more universal database-sourced images with similar image scanning techniques, assess diverse but related medical conditions, and the utilization of repeat trials can help assess the reliability of the model. These results highlight the potential of machine learning algorithms for disease detection with chest X-rays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.