Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185201›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

EXPLANA: A user-friendly workflow for EXPLoratory ANAlysis and feature selection in cross-sectional and longitudinal microbiome studies.

Jennifer Fouquier, Maggie Stanislawski, John O'Connor, Ashley Scadden, Catherine Lozupone

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer FouquierDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-8235
Maggie StanislawskiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0001-7768-8868
John O'ConnorDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0002-1341-833X
Ashley ScaddenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-1442
Catherine LozuponeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.ORCID 0000-0003-4786-7202

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
Dietary and synbiotic strategy to limit gut microbiome dysbiosis and protect against Clostridioides difficile infectionU01AI150589 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LOZUPONE, CATHERINE · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
Diet/gut Microbiome Interaction Influence Inflammatory Disease in HIV PatientsR01DK108366 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CAMPBELL, THOMAS B., LOZUPONE, CATHERINE · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
The Contribution of Omic Profiles to Weight Loss and ObesityK01HL157658 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Maggie A Stanislawski · 2022 to 2026
$794k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL157658NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI150589NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK108366NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Longitudinal microbiome studies (LMS) are increasingly common but have analytic challenges including non-independent data requiring mixed-effects models and large amounts of data that motivate exploratory analysis to identify factors related to outcome variables. Although change analysis (i.e. calculating deltas between values at different timepoints) can be powerful, how to best conduct these analyses is not always clear. For example, observational LMS measurements show natural fluctuations, so baseline might not be a reference of primary interest; whereas, for interventional LMS, baseline is a key reference point, often indicating the start of treatment. Results: To address these challenges, we developed a feature selection workflow for cross-sectional and LMS that supports numerical and categorical data called EXPLANA (EXPLoratory ANAlysis). Machine-learning methods were combined with different types of change calculations and downstream interpretation methods to identify statistically meaningful variables and explain their relationship to outcomes. EXPLANA generates an interactive report that textually and graphically summarizes methods and results. EXPLANA had good performance on simulated data, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91 (range: 0.79-1.0, SD = 0.05), outperformed an existing tool (AUC: 0.95 vs. 0.56), and identified novel order-dependent categorical feature changes. EXPLANA is broadly applicable and simplifies analytics for identifying features related to outcomes of interest.

Identifiers

PMID39185201
PMCPMC11343137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.