Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185224›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Cortical Coding of Gustatory and Thermal Signals in Active Licking Mice.

Audrey N Nash, Morgan Shakeshaft, Cecilia G Bouaichi, Katherine E Odegaard, Tom Needham, Martin Bauer, Richard Bertram, Roberto Vincis

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Audrey N NashFlorida State University, Department of Mathematics.
Morgan ShakeshaftFlorida State University, Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience.
Cecilia G BouaichiFlorida State University, Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience.
Katherine E OdegaardFlorida State University, Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience.
Tom NeedhamFlorida State University, Department of Mathematics.
Martin BauerFlorida State University, Department of Mathematics.
Richard BertramFlorida State University, Department of Mathematics and Programs in Neuroscience and Molecular Biophysics.
Roberto VincisFlorida State University, Department of Biological Science, Programs in Neuroscience, Molecular Biophysics and Cell and Molecular Biology.ORCID 0000-0002-5812-7624

Funding

Chemosensory Training Program (CTP)T32DC000044 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DEBRA Ann FADOOL · 1995 to 2026
$5.3M
Understanding the contribution of the mediodorsal thalamus in gustatory processingR01DC019326 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Roberto Vincis · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019326NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eating behaviors are influenced by the integration of gustatory, olfactory, and somatosensory signals, which all contribute to the perception of flavor. Although extensive research has explored the neural correlates of taste in the gustatory cortex (GC), less is known about its role in encoding thermal information. This study investigates the encoding of oral thermal and chemosensory signals by GC neurons compared to the oral somatosensory cortex. In this study, we recorded the spiking activity of more than 900 GC neurons and 500 neurons from the oral somatosensory cortex in mice allowed to freely lick small drops of gustatory stimuli or deionized water at varying non-nociceptive temperatures. We then developed and used a Bayesian-based analysis technique to assess neural classification scores based on spike rate and phase timing within the lick cycle. Our results indicate that GC neurons rely predominantly on rate information, although phase information is needed to achieve maximum accuracy, to effectively encode both chemosensory and thermosensory signals. GC neurons can effectively differentiate between thermal stimuli, excelling in distinguishing both large contrasts (14°C vs. 36°C) and, although less effectively, more subtle temperature differences. Finally, a direct comparison of the decoding accuracy of thermosensory signals between the two cortices reveals that while the somatosensory cortex showed higher overall accuracy, the GC still encodes significant thermosensory information. These findings highlight the GC's dual role in processing taste and temperature, emphasizing the importance of considering temperature in future studies of taste processing.

Indexed as

Bayesian analysisgustatory cortexintraoral temperatureneural codingoral somatosensory cortexrate and phase codingtaste

Identifiers

PMID39185224
PMCPMC11343142

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.