Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39185637›Full record

Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

From convergence insufficiency to functional reorganization: A longitudinal randomized controlled trial of treatment-induced connectivity plasticity.

Farzin Hajebrahimi, Ayushi Sangoi, Mitchell Scheiman, Elio Santos, Suril Gohel, Tara L Alvarez

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Farzin HajebrahimiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5286-4981
Ayushi SangoiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4151-4940
Mitchell ScheimanPennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elio SantosDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Suril GohelDepartment of Health Informatics, Rutgers University School of Health Professions, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Tara L AlvarezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Functional Mechanisms of Neural Control in Convergence InsufficiencyR01EY023261 · NEI · NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ALVAREZ, TARA LYNN · 2014 to 2025
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023261NIH HHS NEI R01EY023261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionConvergence Insufficiency (CI) is the most prevalent oculomotor dysfunction of binocular vision that negatively impacts quality of life when performing visual near tasks. Decreased resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is reported in the CI participants compared to binocularly normal control participants. Studies report that therapeutic interventions such as office-based vergence and accommodative therapy (OBVAT) can improve CI participants' clinical signs, visual symptoms, and task-related functional activity. However, longitudinal studies investigating the RSFC changes after such treatments in participants with CI have not been conducted. This study aimed to investigate the neural basis of OBVAT using RSFC in CI participants compared to the placebo treatment to understand how OBVAT improves visual function and symptoms.

methodsA total of 51 CI participants between 18 and 35 years of age were included in the study and randomly allocated to receive either 12 one-hour sessions of OBVAT or placebo treatment for 6 to 8 weeks (1 to 2 sessions per week). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and clinical assessments were evaluated at baseline and outcome for each treatment group. Region of interest (ROI) analysis was conducted in nine ROIs of the oculomotor vergence network, including the following: cerebellar vermis (CV), frontal eye fields (FEF), supplementary eye fields (SEF), parietal eye fields (PEF), and primary visual cortices (V1). Paired t-tests assessed RSFC changes in each group. A linear regression analysis was conducted for significant ROI pairs in the group-level analysis for correlations with clinical measures.

resultsPaired t-test results showed increased RSFC in 10 ROI pairs after the OBVAT but not placebo treatment (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected). These ROI pairs included the following: Left (L)-SEF-Right (R)-V1, L-SEF-CV, R-SEF-R-PEF, R-SEF-L-V1, R-SEF-R-V1, R-SEF-CV, R-PEF-CV, L-V1-CV, R-V1-CV, and L-V1-R-V1. Significant correlations were observed between the RSFC strength of the R-SEF-R-PEF ROI pair and the following clinical visual function parameters: positive fusional vergence and near point of convergence (p < 0.05).

conclusionOBVAT, but not placebo treatment, increased the RSFC in the ROIs of the oculomotor vergence network, which was correlated with the improvements in the clinical measures of the CI participants.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronal PlasticityOcular Motility DisordersAccommodation, OcularAdolescentAdultBrainConvergence, OcularDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultbinocular visionconvergence insufficiencyfMRIresting‐state functional connectivity

Identifiers

PMID39185637
PMCPMC11345633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.