Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186104›Full record

GuidelineEuropean radiology2025

ESR Essentials: imaging of middle ear cholesteatoma-practice recommendations by the European Society of Head and Neck Radiology.

Philip Touska, Steve E J Connor

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Modeling residual cholesteatoma growth rate: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. [Staging of middle ear cholesteatoma surgery and its value for clinical decision-making].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philip TouskaDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Steve E J ConnorDepartment of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom. steve.connor@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5502-4972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although non-malignant, middle ear cholesteatoma can result in significant complications due to local bone erosion and infection. The treatment of cholesteatoma is surgical, but residual disease is common and may be clinically occult, particularly when the canal wall is preserved or reconstructive techniques are employed. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the management of patients with middle ear cholesteatoma-aiding clinical diagnosis, identifying complications, planning surgery, and detecting residual disease at follow-up. Computed tomography is the primary imaging tool in the preoperative setting since it can provide both a surgical roadmap and detect erosive complications of cholesteatoma. The ability of magnetic resonance imaging with non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted sequences to accurately detect residual disease has led to a shift in the diagnostic paradigm for post-surgical follow-up of cholesteatoma, such that routine "second-look" surgery is no longer required. The following practice recommendations are aimed at helping the radiologist choose appropriate imaging approaches and understand the key diagnostic considerations for the evaluation of pre- and post-surgical middle ear cholesteatoma. KEY POINTS: In the preoperative setting, CT is the first-line imaging modality and MRI is reserved for rare clinical scenarios (low evidence). Non-echoplanar imaging (EPI) DWI is the optimal MRI sequence for the detection of residual cholesteatoma (moderate evidence). Non-EPI DWI plays an important role in the postoperative surveillance of cholesteatoma (moderate evidence).

Indexed as

Cholesteatoma, Middle EarMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedEuropeHumansSocieties, MedicalCholesteatoma earDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingEar diseasesMiddleTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39186104
PMCPMC11913933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.