Evidence mapPaperPMID 39186128Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2024

Integrating surgical intervention and watch-and-wait approach in dMMR metastatic rectal cancer with pembrolizumab: a case report.

Yohei Ando, Tsubasa Sakurai, Kosuke Ozaki, Shimpei Matsui, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Takashi Akiyoshi, Izuma Nakayama, Yasuyuki Shigematsu, Atsushi Oba and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The emerging role of watch and wait in metastatic rectal cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yohei AndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Tsubasa SakuraiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. super.tuppo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-6383
Kosuke OzakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Shimpei MatsuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Toshiki MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Tomohiro YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Takashi AkiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Izuma NakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yasuyuki ShigematsuDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Atsushi ObaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Akiko ChinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Yosuke FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-Ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreating rectal cancer presents challenges due to postoperative complications and reduced quality of life (QOL). Recent evidence supports the watch-and-wait (WW) approach for patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following preoperative treatment. In this report, we discuss a case of metastatic rectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) treated successfully with pembrolizumab. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old male with dMMR rectal cancer and a single liver metastasis underwent treatment with pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy. After 10 courses, the rectal lesion achieved cCR, prompting the selection of the WW approach. The liver metastasis showed significant shrinkage; however, the presence of a residual tumor was suspected, leading to a metastasectomy. A pathological complete response (pCR) was confirmed via histological examination. During a 24-month follow-up, there was no evidence of tumor regrowth, local recurrence, or distant metastasis.

conclusionsThe WW strategy is increasingly accepted for patients achieving cCR after preoperative treatment. While pCR in dMMR rectal cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been documented, accurately predicting pCR from imaging remains challenging. This case illustrates that integrating ICI therapy, surgical interventions, and the WW approach can effectively achieve both oncological safety and improved QOL in the treatment of dMMR metastatic rectal cancer.

Indexed as

Deficient mismatch repairImmune checkpoint inhibitorMSH6Rectal cancerWatch-and-wait approach

Identifiers

PMID39186128
PMCPMC11347510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.