Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39186743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Depressive symptoms and the processing of unexpected social feedback: Differences in surprise levels, feedback acceptance, and "immunizing" cognition.

Lukas Kirchner, Winfried Rief, Lilly Müller, Hannah Buchwald, Kari Fuhrmann, Max Berg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07388004 (Rewiring Expectations and Amplifying Rewards), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07388004 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Rewiring Expectations and Amplifying Rewards: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanism-Based Group Psychotherapy for Major Depressive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhilipps University MarburgRan2025 to 2028Enrolled150ConditionsMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD)ArmsExpectation-Focused Psychotherapeutic Intervention, Reward Enhancement and Activation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas KirchnerDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9564-1964
Winfried RiefDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7019-2250
Lilly MüllerDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Hannah BuchwaldDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Kari FuhrmannDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Max BergDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-7869

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative social expectations are a key symptom of depression. It has been suggested that individuals with depressive symptoms tend to maintain these expectations by devaluing new experiences that do not fit prior expectations. However, our understanding of the role of such "immunizing" cognition in response to unexpected social feedback in depression, as well as the cognitive mechanisms involved, remains limited. This study investigated the association between depressive symptoms and the cognitive processing of unexpected positive or negative social feedback using a novel, video-based approach featuring naturalistic social stimuli in a subclinical online sample (N = 155). We also examined how surprise levels, feedback acceptance and immunizing cognition relate to other cognitive processes, such as attributional style and rumination, using cross-sectional network analyses. Robust multiple linear regression analyses revealed that depressive symptoms were associated with higher surprise levels (R2adj. = .27), lower feedback acceptance (R2adj. = .19), and higher levels of immunizing cognition (R2adj. = .09) in response to unexpected positive social feedback, but only partially to unexpected negative social feedback. The network analysis suggested that self-efficacy expectations for coping with negative feelings and acceptance of positive social feedback had the strongest expected influence on the different cognitive processes. Our study highlights the challenges that individuals with depressive symptoms face in utilizing positive social feedback to modify negative expectations. For clinicians, our findings suggest the importance of promoting acceptance of positive social feedback, while simultaneously inhibiting immunizing cognition and avoiding the use of overly positive feedback.

Indexed as

CognitionDepressionAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39186743
PMCPMC11346924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.