ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2024
Improved functions for nonlinear sequence comparison using SEEKR.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scanning transcriptomes for nonlinear, domain-level similarities using hmSEEKR.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Correlated protein-RNA associations and a requirement for HNRNPU in the long-range recruitment of Polycomb Repressive Complexes by the lncRNAs Airn and Kcnq1ot1.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Noncoding and coding mechanisms of aging-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction associated with thyroid dysfunction.Disease models & mechanisms · 2025Article
- Isogenic comparison of Airn and Xist reveals core principles of Polycomb recruitment by lncRNAs.Molecular cell · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SEquence Evaluation through
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.