Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187546›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Insights into aging mechanisms from comparative genomics in orange and silver roughies.

Dido Carrero, Maria Pascual-Torner, Diana Álvarez-Puente, Víctor Quesada, Claudia García-Gómez, Carlos López-Otín

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dido Carrero *Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Maria Pascual-Torner *Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. mariapascual1.618@gmail.com.
Diana Álvarez-PuenteDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Víctor QuesadaDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Claudia García-GómezDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
Carlos López-OtínDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncología, Ciberonc, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

Funding

European Research Council DeAge, ERC Advanced Grant, 742067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demersal fish orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) can live for up to 250 years, twenty times more than its congener silver roughy (Hoplostethus mediterraneus). Studies of Hoplostethus have focused mainly on its ecology and conservation due to its vulnerability to commercial fishing. In this work, we present the de novo genomes of orange and silver roughies and explore the genomic mechanisms that could contribute to such differential longevities. Using comparative genomics on a list of more than 400 genes, we identified gene candidates with differential residue changes in Hoplostethus that are related to genomic instability, disabled macroautophagy and intercellular communication. We hypothesized that these mechanisms could have been selected as adaptations to the deep environment and, as an epiphenomenon of these mechanisms, may have contributed to an extension of the lifespan of H. atlanticus.

Indexed as

AgingGenomicsAnimalsFishesGenomeGenomic InstabilityLongevity

Identifiers

PMID39187546
PMCPMC11347708

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.