Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39187609›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

Larger colony sizes favoured the evolution of more worker castes in ants.

Louis Bell-Roberts, Juliet F R Turner, Gijsbert D A Werner, Philip A Downing, Laura Ross, Stuart A West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A population threshold for dedicated teaching.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Larger colony sizes favour greater division of labour between queens and workers in ants.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2026
    Article
  7. Environmental conditions shape the global distribution of ant societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  15. Social control drove ant evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Group size and labour demands determine division of labour as a consequence of demographic stochasticity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Louis Bell-RobertsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. louis.bellroberts@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4035-8168
Juliet F R TurnerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gijsbert D A WernerDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Philip A DowningEcology & Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-3153
Laura RossInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-4161
Stuart A WestDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-3153

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 834164European Research Council 834164RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/M011224/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size-complexity hypothesis is a leading explanation for the evolution of complex life on earth. It predicts that in lineages that have undergone a major transition in organismality, larger numbers of lower-level subunits select for increased division of labour. Current data from multicellular organisms and social insects support a positive correlation between the number of cells and number of cell types and between colony size and the number of castes. However, the implication of these results is unclear, because colony size and number of cells are correlated with other variables which may also influence selection for division of labour, and causality could be in either direction. Here, to resolve this problem, we tested multiple causal hypotheses using data from 794 ant species. We found that larger colony sizes favoured the evolution of increased division of labour, resulting in more worker castes and greater variation in worker size. By contrast, our results did not provide consistent support for alternative hypotheses regarding either queen mating frequency or number of queens per colony explaining variation in division of labour. Overall, our results provide strong support for the size-complexity hypothesis.

Indexed as

AntsBiological EvolutionPopulation DensityAnimalsSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID39187609
PMCPMC7616618

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.