ArticleBMC neurology2024
Machine learning-based predictive model for the development of thrombolysis resistance in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictive performance of machine learning models in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Thrombolytic resistance: an important factor leading to the failure of intravenous thrombolytic therapy.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- [A prediction model for early neurological improvement after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- An Explainable Two-Stage Machine Learning Model for Predicting the Post-Thrombolysis Complications in Stroke Patients: A Multi-Center Study.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review.Neurointervention · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to establish a predictive model utilizing machine learning techniques to anticipate the likelihood of thrombolysis resistance (TR) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) intravenous thrombolysis, given that nearly half of such patients exhibit poor clinical outcomes.
methodsRetrospective clinical data were collected from AIS patients who underwent intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University. Thrombolysis resistance was defined as ([National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission - 24-hour NIHSS] × 100%/ NIHSS at admission) ≤ 30%. In this study, we developed five machine learning models: logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and random forest (RF). We assessed the model's performance by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA), and presented the results through a nomogram.
resultsThis study included a total of 218 patients with AIS who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 88 patients experienced TR. Among the five machine learning models, the LASSO model performed the best. The area under the curve (AUC) on the testing group was 0.765 (sensitivity: 0.767, specificity: 0.694, accuracy: 0.727). The apparent curve in the calibration curve was similar to the ideal curve, and DCA showed a positive net benefit. Key features associated with TR included NIHSS at admission, blood glucose, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, and blood urea nitrogen.
conclusionMachine learning methods with multiple clinical variables can help in early screening of patients at high risk of thrombolysis resistance, particularly in contexts where healthcare resources are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.