Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39188560›Full record

ArticleSmart medicine2023

Tissue adhesives for wound closure.

Bin Kong, Cheng Qi, Huan Wang, Tiantian Kong, Zhou Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Smart medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bin KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7842-0169
Cheng QiCollege of Mechatronics and Control Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China.
Huan WangThe Eighth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University Shenzhen China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-3702
Tiantian KongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering School of Medicine Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China.
Zhou LiuCollege of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Shenzhen University Shenzhen Guangdong China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue adhesives have raised much attention from scientists in recent years. They have been extensively utilized in various medical fields, such as wound closure, due to the advantages of being simple, time-saving, and avoiding the problems and complications associated with surgical sutures. Besides, the tissue adhesives can absorb wound exudates and promote tissue repair. The rapid evolution in the field of tissue adhesives has resulted in the development of various adhesives with excellent mechanical properties and superior functions. However, many challenges still restrict their use in numerous clinical applications. In this paper, we present an up-to-date review of tissue adhesives for wound closure. We mainly discussed the fundamental design requirements for the adhesives, the fabrication of tissue adhesives, and the application of tissue adhesives on skin healing, corneal patch, and gastrointestinal tissues. We then highlighted the current challenges and unmet needs and delineated potential new clinical development directions for future adhesives. The progress in tissue adhesives will provide novel approaches for wound management and has the potential to supply effective treatments for a variety of medical applications.

Indexed as

adhesivecorneagastrointestinal tissuesmaterialsskinwound

Identifiers

PMID39188560
PMCPMC11235766

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.