ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024
A statistical-physics approach for codon usage optimisation.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards mRNA therapeutics 2.0.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- A Physics-Inspired Approach to Improve Oligonucleotide Design and Gene Synthesis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Preserved efficacy of lyophilized SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine incorporating novel ionizable lipids after one year at 25 °C.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- A Review on the Stability Challenges of Advanced Biologic Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Molecular and Immunological Properties of a Chimeric Glycosyl Hydrolase 18 Based on Immunoinformatics Approaches: A Design of a New Anti-ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The concept of "codon optimisation" involves adjusting the coding sequence of a target protein to account for the inherent codon preferences of a host species and maximise protein expression in that species. However, there is still a lack of consensus on the most effective approach to achieve optimal results. Existing methods typically depend on heuristic combinations of different variables, leaving the user with the final choice of the sequence hit. In this study, we propose a new statistical-physics model for codon optimisation. This model, called the Nearest-Neighbour interaction (NN) model, links the probability of any given codon sequence to the "interactions" between neighbouring codons. We used the model to design codon sequences for different proteins of interest, and we compared our sequences with the predictions of some commercial tools. In order to assess the importance of the pair interactions, we additionally compared the NN model with a simpler method (Ind) that disregards interactions. It was observed that the NN method yielded similar Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) values to those obtained by other commercial algorithms, despite the fact that CAI was not explicitly considered in the algorithm. By utilising both the NN and Ind methods to optimise the reporter protein luciferase, and then analysing the translation performance in human cell lines and in a mouse model, we found that the NN approach yielded the highest protein expression
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.