ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Optimal cut-off points of anthropometric and body roundness indices associated with diabetes: Persian (Shahedieh) cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of body roundness index with circadian syndrome: a cross-sectional study using NHANES data from 2009 to 2018.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes is a chronic and concerning health condition that poses a significant public health challenge. Given that preventing, detecting early, and treating T2DM can enhance public health outcomes, the objective of this study was to identify the most effective obesity indices and determine their optimal cut-off points for predicting the risk of T2DM in an Iranian population. Methods: This study was conducted on 8,019 male and female participants aged between 35 and 70 years in the context of Shahedieh cohort study. The ROC curve analysis was utilized to determine the optimal cut-off point of each anthropometric index to predict diabetes in age-sex categories. Results: The overall diabetes incidence in the study population was 2.5%, with 2.5% in men and 2.4% in women. In men, significant differences in most of the anthropometric indices were observed between diabetic individuals and healthy counterparts. This study found that for women 45-65, BMI and weight, and for men under 65 years, weight, WHR, BMI, WC, WHTR, AVI, and BRI are efficient T2DM predictors. The AUC of these indices varied from 0.593 (95% CI: 0.510-0.676) to 0.668 (95% CI: 0.586-0.750) in men, and from 0.587 (95% CI: 0.510-0.664) to 0.644 (95% CI: 0.535-0.754) in women. Conclusion: Anthropometric indices and body roundness are simple, inexpensive, and noninvasive means markers to predict the risk of diabetes. Our findings show that most of the studied indices had acceptable prediction power for men except for elderly. For women over 45 years old, weight and BMI are appropriate predictors. It seems that the approach of reducing diabetes incidence through early detection and primary prevention is achievable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.