Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39192357›Full record

ReviewCell & bioscience2024

Insights into the m

Zewei Gao, Xuan Zha, Min Li, Xueli Xia, Shengjun Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell & bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. mMolecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  6. The relevance of mJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. mRedox biology · 2026
    Review
  10. FTO separation-of-function mutations alter mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Targeting intracellular mRNA mJournal of advanced research · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. RNA modifications in peripheral blood are associated with acute coronary syndrome.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zewei GaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine,Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
Xuan ZhaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine,Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China.
Min LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212002, China. 1677644652@qq.com.
Xueli XiaDepartment of Immunology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Shengjun WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine,Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China. sjwjs@ujs.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-1183

Funding

Gynecology Project of Zhenjiang Traditional Chinese Medicine SS2021006Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline Cultivation Unit JSDW202241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m

Indexed as

ALKBH5DemethylasesFTON6-methyladenosine (m6A)

Identifiers

PMID39192357
PMCPMC11351023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.