ArticleRSC advances2024
Drug release system based on a composite polycaprolactone nanofiber membrane with dual functionality of shape memory effect and antibacterial ability.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Design Concepts for Shape-Memory Polymers in Biomedical Applications and Soft Robotics.Polymers · 2026Review
- A cost-effective and open-source near-field electrospinning system with a graphical user interface.HardwareX · 2025Article
- Natural anti-cancer products: insights from herbal medicine.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a multifunctional composite membrane based on polycaprolactone nanofibers having controlled drug release, shape memory effect, and antibacterial ability was successfully prepared by the electrospinning technique. The addition of graphene oxide (GO), zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), polyethylene glycol (PEG), and berberine (BBR) strongly affected the morphology, crystalline degree, melting temperature, and shape memory performance of the composite membrane, thanks to the physical crosslinking network formed by the hydrogen bonding or van der Waals interactions between the components. As a result, the recovery ratio of the composite membrane reached a higher value (76.3% ± 0.7%) than that of the PCL fiber membrane (22.8% ± 0.7%). The additional components significantly improved the wettability of the composite membrane, leading to a high amount of BBR released (42.7 wt%) during 40 hours, as well as effective antibacterial ability. Besides, the BBR release can be feasibly controlled by modulating the deformation ratio of the composite membrane, whereby the higher deformation ratio resulted in a higher BBR release. Therefore, it is suggested that the prepared composite nanofiber membrane is a potential smart material used in biomedical applications, such as wound dressing and drug release systems.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.