Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193382›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Hematological indicator-based machine learning models for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.

Huan Zhao, Yuling Wang, Yilin Sun, Yongqiang Wang, Bo Shi, Jian Liu, Sai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huan Zhao *School of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Yuling Wang *Department of Gynecology and Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Yilin SunDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Yongqiang WangSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Bo ShiSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Gynecology and Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
Sai ZhangSchool of Medical Imaging, Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is an important prognostic factor for cervical cancer (CC) and determines the treatment strategy. Hematological indicators have been reported as being useful biomarkers for the prognosis of a variety of cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of machine learning models characterized by preoperative hematological indicators to predict the LNM status of CC patients before surgery. Methods: The clinical data of 236 patients with pathologically confirmed CC were retrospectively analyzed at the Gynecology Oncology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University from November 2020 to August 2022. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to select 21 features from 35 hematological indicators and for the construction of 6 machine learning predictive models, including Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and Logistic Regression (LR), as well as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Evaluation metrics of predictive models included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1-score. Results: RF has the best overall predictive performance for ten-fold cross-validation in the training set. The specific performance indicators of RF were AUC (0.910, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.820-1.000), accuracy (0.831, 95% CI: 0.702-0.960), specificity (0.835, 95% CI: 0.708-0.962), sensitivity (0.831, 95% CI: 0.702-0.960), and F1-score (0.829, 95% CI: 0.696-0.962). RF had the highest AUC in the testing set (AUC = 0.854). Conclusion: RF based on preoperative hematological indicators that are easily available in clinical practice showed superior performance in the preoperative prediction of CC LNM. However, investigations on larger external cohorts of patients are required for further validation of our findings.

Indexed as

cervical cancerhematological indicatorslymph node metastasismachine learningpreoperative prediction

Identifiers

PMID39193382
PMCPMC11347340

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.