Evidence mapPaperPMID 39193389Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Clinical insights into nanomedicine and biosafety: advanced therapeutic approaches for common urological cancers.

Mohammad Reza Fattahi, Mansoureh Dehghani, Somayyeh Paknahad, Shafa Rahiminia, Deniz Zareie, Behzad Hoseini, Tahmineh Rajaee Oroomi, Hossein Motedayyen, Reza Arefnezhad

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MXene and prostate cancer: is there promising news?Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammad Reza FattahiStudent Research Committee, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mansoureh DehghaniReza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center (RROC), Mashhad, Iran.
Somayyeh PaknahadLegal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran.
Shafa RahiminiaSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Deniz ZareieSchool of Medicine, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran.
Behzad HoseiniSchool of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Tahmineh Rajaee OroomiIslamic Azad Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein MotedayyenAutoimmune Diseases Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Reza ArefnezhadCoenzyme R Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urological cancers including those of the prostate, bladder, and kidney, are prevalent and often lethal malignancies besides other less common ones like testicular and penile cancers. Current treatments have major limitations like side effects, recurrence, resistance, high costs, and poor quality of life. Nanotechnology offers promising solutions through enhanced diagnostic accuracy, targeted drug delivery, controlled release, and multimodal imaging. This review reflects clinical challenges and nanomedical advances across major urological cancers. In prostate cancer, nanoparticles improve delineation and radiosensitization in radiation therapy, enable fluorescent guidance in surgery, and enhance chemotherapy penetration in metastatic disease. Nanoparticles also overcome bladder permeability barriers to increase the residence time of intravesical therapy and chemotherapy agents. In renal cancer, nanocarriers potentiate tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy while gene vectors and zinc oxide nanoparticles demonstrate antiproliferative effects. Across modalities, urological applications of nanomedicine include polymeric, liposomal, and metal nanoparticles for targeted therapy, prodrug delivery, photodynamic therapy, and thermal ablation. Biosafety assessments reveal favorable profiles but clinical translation remains limited, necessitating further trials. In conclusion, nanotechnology holds significant potential for earlier detection, precise intervention, and tailored treatment of urological malignancies, warranting expanded research to transform patient outcomes.

Indexed as

biosafetycancerclinicalnanomedicinenanoparticletreatmenturology

Identifiers

PMID39193389
PMCPMC11347329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.