ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Investigating the causal relationship between gut microbiota and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precision nutrition targeting the gut microbiota for weight management: mechanisms and applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- A Low-Cost, High-Fat Diet Effectively Induces Obesity and Metabolic Alterations and Diet Normalization Modulates Microbiota in C57BL/6 Mice.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiota-Brain Axis in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: An Observational Analysis.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Multifaceted effects of the microbiome in pancreatic cancer: from association to modulation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiota and Autism Spectrum Disorders: Neurodevelopmental, Behavioral, and Gastrointestinal Interactions.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Decoding Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Molecular Profiles, Biomarkers, and Pathways to Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A systematic Mendelian randomized study of the effects of the gut microbiome and immune cells on pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the immunological terrain of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: strategies to prompt immunotherapy from Mendelian randomization.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- [Causal association between gut microbiota and food allergy: a Mendelian randomization analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- The Microbiota and Evolution of Obesity.Endocrine reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The interaction between the intestinal flora and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) remains poorly understood, despite the known effect of the gut microbiota on gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. Hence, the present research aimed to determine the potential causal correlation between the intestinal flora and GEP-NENs by conducting a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: Two-sample MR analysis was conducted using the summary statistics of the gut microbiota from the MiBioGen consortium and those of GEP-NENs from the FinnGen research project. The inverse-variance weighted approach was utilized as the primary analytical method. To enhance the robustness of our findings, multiple sensitivity tests were performed, including Cochran's Q test for evaluating heterogeneity, the MR-Egger intercept test to detect horizontal pleiotropy, and the MR-PRESSO test to identify outliers and assess pleiotropy bias. Additionally, a leave-one-out analysis was performed to validate the consistency of our findings. The MR-Steiger test was also utilized to determine the causal direction in the correlation between the gut microbiota and GEP-NENs. Finally, a reverse MR analysis was performed to assess reverse causality between the intestinal flora and GEP-NENs. Results: We identified 42 taxa of the gut microbiota that were potentially causally associated with GEP-NENs; of these taxa, 7, 8, 11, and 16 taxa were causally associated with pancreatic NENs, colorectal NENs, small intestinal NENs, and gastric NENs, respectively. After adjusting for false discovery rate (FDR) correction, we found significant causal links of Euryarchaeota with small intestinal NENs and Family XIII UCG-001 with gastric NENs. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of these correlations. In the reverse MR analysis, colorectal NENs and small intestinal NENs were found to be associated with variations in 8 and 6 different taxa of the gut microbiota, respectively. After adjusting for FDR correction, no significant causal links were detected between GEP-NENs and the intestinal flora. Conclusion: The present study reveals a potential causal association between certain taxa of the intestinal flora and GEP-NENs, thus providing new perspectives regarding the role of the intestinal flora in the development of these tumors. These insights could provide innovative approaches to screen and prevent these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.