Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39193769›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Comparative Population Genomics of Arctic Sled Dogs Reveals a Deep and Complex History.

Tracy A Smith, Krishnamoorthy Srikanth, Heather Jay Huson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tracy A SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-9679
Krishnamoorthy SrikanthDepartment of Animal Sciences, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5205-193X
Heather Jay HusonDepartment of Animal Sciences, Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8299-0447

Funding

Neogen GenomicsSiberian Husky Club of AmericaUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County 2021-22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence demonstrates genomic and morphological continuity in the Arctic ancestral lineage of dogs. Here, we use the Siberian Husky to investigate the genomic legacy of the northeast Eurasian Arctic lineage and model the deep population history using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms. Utilizing ancient dog-calibrated molecular clocks, we found that at least two distinct lineages of Arctic dogs existed in ancient Eurasia at the end of the Pleistocene. This pushes back the origin of sled dogs in the northeast Siberian Arctic with humans likely intentionally selecting dogs to perform different functions and keeping breeding populations that overlap in time and space relatively reproductively isolated. In modern Siberian Huskies, we found significant population structure based on how they are used by humans, recent European breed introgression in about half of the dogs that participate in races, moderate levels of inbreeding, and fewer potentially harmful variants in populations under strong selection for form and function (show, sled show, and racing populations of Siberian Huskies). As the struggle to preserve unique evolutionary lineages while maintaining genetic health intensifies across pedigreed dogs, understanding the genomic history to guide policies and best practices for breed management is crucial to sustain these ancient lineages and their unique evolutionary identity.

Indexed as

DogsMetagenomicsAnimalsArctic RegionsPhylogenyArctic dogscanine evolutioncanine genetic healthSiberian Huskysled dogs

Identifiers

PMID39193769
PMCPMC11403282

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.