SynthesisOtolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery2025
Patterns of Teprotumumab-Induced Hearing Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Audiologic Assessment and Management of Teprotumumab-Associated Ototoxicity: An Updated Narrative Review.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Review
- Targeted immunotherapies for Graves' thyroidal & orbital diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHearing loss has been reported after administration of the monoclonal antibody teprotumumab. The purpose of this study was to review available evidence regarding the patterns of teprotumumab-related ototoxicity. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. REVIEW
methodsA systematic review was performed using standardized methodology. Studies were included if they included subjects who were prescribed teprotumumab. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, abstracts, letters/commentaries, case reports, and reviews. Subjects without both pre- and posttreatment audiometric data were also excluded. Bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.
resultsFrom an initial search of 76 articles, 7 studies reporting on 109 unique patients were included. Four studies were level 4 evidence, 1 study was level 3 evidence, and 2 studies were level 2 evidence. Mean age was 55 ± 14 years with a female predominance (64%). The most commonly reported symptoms were hearing loss (22%), followed by fullness (18%) and tinnitus (14%). In total, 41% of patients with available data met criteria for ototoxicity, all exhibiting shifts in the middle frequencies or higher. Fifteen (14%) patients underwent ultrahigh frequency audiometric testing and 8 (53%, 8/15) demonstrated shifts exclusively in this range.
conclusionOtotoxicity may occur in patients treated with teprotumumab. Hearing loss occurs primarily in higher frequencies, and routine hearing screening with ultrahigh frequency testing may be warranted. The true incidence of ototoxicity with teprotumumab remains unknown, and more data is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms and develop strategies to minimize risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.