ArticleBiology2024
D-sORF: Accurate Ab Initio Classification of Experimentally Detected Small Open Reading Frames (sORFs) Associated with Translational Machinery.
Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small open reading frames (sORFs; <300 nucleotides or <100 amino acids) are widespread across all genomes, and an increasing variety of them appear to be translating from non-genic regions. Over the past few decades, peptides produced from sORFs have been identified as functional in various organisms, from bacteria to humans. Despite recent advances in next-generation sequencing and proteomics, accurate annotation and classification of sORFs remain a rate-limiting step toward reliable and high-throughput detection of small proteins from non-genic regions. Additionally, the cost of computational methods utilizing machine learning is lower than that of biological experiments, and they can be employed to detect sORFs, laying the groundwork for biological experiments. We present D-sORF, a machine-learning framework that integrates the statistical nucleotide context and motif information around the start codon to predict coding sORFs. D-sORF scores directly for coding identity and requires only the underlying genomic sequence, without incorporating parameters such as the conservation, which, in the case of sORFs, may increase the dispersion of scores within the significantly less conserved non-genic regions. D-sORF achieves 94.74% precision and 92.37% accuracy for small ORFs (using the 99 nt medium length window). When D-sORF is applied to sORFs associated with ribosomes, the identification of transcripts producing peptides (annotated by the Ensembl IDs) is similar to or superior to experimental methodologies based on ribosome-sequencing (Ribo-Seq) profiling. In parallel, the recognition of putative negative data, such as the intron-containing transcripts that associate with ribosomes, remains remarkably low, indicating that D-sORF could be efficiently applied to filter out false-positive sORFs from Ribo-Seq data because of the non-productive ribosomal binding or noise inherent in these protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.