Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39194595›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2024

Identification and Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles: Comparison of SDS-PAGE Analysis and Biosensor Analysis with QCM and IDT Chips.

Yaw-Jen Chang, Wen-Tung Yang, Cheng-Hsuan Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yaw-Jen ChangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li District, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.
Wen-Tung YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li District, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsuan LeiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Chung Li District, Taoyuan City 320314, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents and compares two methods for identifying the types of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from different cell lines. Through SDS-PAGE analysis, we discovered that the ratio of CD63 to CD81 in different EVs is consistent and distinct, making it a reliable characteristic for recognizing EVs secreted by cancer cells. However, the electrophoresis and imaging processes may introduce errors in the concentration values, especially at lower concentrations, rendering this method potentially less effective. An alternative approach involves the use of quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and electroanalytical interdigitated electrode (IDT) biosensors for EV type identification and quantification. The QCM frequency shift caused by EVs is directly proportional to their concentration, while electroanalysis relies on measuring the curvature of the I-V curve as a distinguishing feature, which is also proportional to EV concentration. Linear regression lines for the QCM frequency shift and the electroanalysis curvature of various EV types are plotted separately, enabling the estimation of the corresponding concentration for an unknown EV type on the graphs. By intersecting the results from both biosensors, the unknown EV type can be identified. The biosensor analysis method proves to be an effective means of analyzing both the type and concentration of EVs from different cell lines.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesExtracellular VesiclesQuartz Crystal Microbalance TechniquesCell Line, TumorElectrodesElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansextracellular vesicles (EVs)interdigitated electrode (IDT)quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)SDS-PAGE

Identifiers

PMID39194595
PMCPMC11352818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.