ReviewCells2024
The Case for Bisphosphonate Use in Astronauts Flying Long-Duration Missions.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The physiology of survival: Space.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Use of DXA-based software to identify astronauts at risk for persisting spaceflight-induced bone loss.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Staphylococcal enterotoxin C2 rescued simulated microgravity-induced bone loss and the trans-differentiation of BMSCs into adipocytes.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
- Effects of Weightlessness on Molecular Changes in Cellular Organisms, Animals and Plants.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- BMP9 attenuates microgravity-related disuse osteoporosis by modulating TGFβ and BMP signaling.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in the structure of bone can occur in space as an adaptive response to microgravity and on Earth due to the adaptive effects to exercise, to the aging of bone cells, or to prolonged disuse. Knowledge of cell-mediated bone remodeling on Earth informs our understanding of bone tissue changes in space and whether these skeletal changes might increase the risk for fractures or premature osteoporosis in astronauts. Comparisons of skeletal health between astronauts and aging humans, however, may be both informative and misleading. Astronauts are screened for a high level of physical fitness and health, are launched with high bone mineral densities, and perform exercise daily in space to combat skeletal atrophy as an adaptive response to reduced weight-bearing function, while the elderly display cellular and tissue pathology as a response to senescence and disuse. Current clinical testing for age-related bone change, applied to astronauts, may not be sufficient for fully understanding risks associated with rare and uniquely induced bone changes. This review aims to (i) highlight cellular analogies between spaceflight-induced and age-related bone loss, which could aid in predicting fractures, (ii) discuss why overreliance on terrestrial clinical approaches may miss potentially irreversible disruptions in trabecular bone microarchitecture induced by spaceflight, and (iii) detail how the cellular effects of the bisphosphonate class of drugs offer a prophylactic countermeasure for suppressing the elevated bone resorption characteristically observed during long-duration spaceflights. Thus the use of the bisphosphonate will help protect the bone from structural changes while in microgravity either along with exercise or alone when exercise is not performed, e.g. after an injury or illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.