Article in Methods and protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Luciane Dias de OliveiraDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-7768
Ana Luisa Monteiro RibeiroCampus São José dos Campos, Universidade Paulista-UNIP, Highway Presidente Dutra, km 157.5, South Lane, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12240-420, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-4256-882X
Sthéfani de Oliveira DiasDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Geovani Moreira da CruzDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-1788-5575
Raquel Teles de MenezesDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Lara Steffany de CarvalhoDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.
Mariana Gadelho Gimenez DiamantinoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2299-9751
Thaís Cristine PereiraDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7206-3348
Maria Cristina MarcucciDepartment of Bioscience and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8065-5618
Amjad Abu HasnaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Campus of São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-985X
Funding
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/16855-4
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Acinetobacter baumanniiantimicrobial and antibiofilm effectherbal extractsMyrciaria caulifloraphytochemical compositionStaphylococcus aureus
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Phytochemical Composition and Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of · full record | Socratic