ArticlePloS one2024
Self-Adaptive Teacher-Student framework for colon polyp segmentation from unannotated private data with public annotated datasets.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colon polyps have become a focal point of research due to their heightened potential to develop into appendiceal cancer, which has the highest mortality rate globally. Although numerous colon polyp segmentation methods have been developed using public polyp datasets, they tend to underperform on private datasets due to inconsistencies in data distribution and the difficulty of fine-tuning without annotations. In this paper, we propose a Self-Adaptive Teacher-Student (SATS) framework to segment colon polyps from unannotated private data by utilizing multiple publicly annotated datasets. The SATS trains multiple teacher networks on public datasets and then generates pseudo-labels on private data to assist in training a student network. To enhance the reliability of the pseudo-labels from the teacher networks, the SATS includes a newly proposed Uncertainty and Distance Fusion (UDFusion) strategy. UDFusion dynamically adjusts the pseudo-label weights based on a novel reconstruction similarity measure, innovatively bridging the gap between private and public data distributions. To ensure accurate identification and segmentation of colon polyps, the SATS also incorporates a Granular Attention Network (GANet) architecture for both teacher and student networks. GANet first identifies polyps roughly from a global perspective by encoding long-range anatomical dependencies and then refines this identification to remove false-positive areas through multi-scale background-foreground attention. The SATS framework was validated using three public datasets and one private dataset, achieving 76.30% on IoU, 86.00% on Recall, and 7.01 pixels on HD. These results outperform the existing five methods, indicating the effectiveness of this approach for colon polyp segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.