ArticleScientific reports2024
Comparison of bone turnover suppression in atypical femoral fractures and osteoporotic hip fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for atypical femur fractures with and without bisphosphonate treatment: a national nested case-control study.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Association between femoral localized cortical thickening ("beaking" or "flaring") and bisphosphonate duration in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2026Article
- Atypical Femur Fractures Without Bisphosphonate Exposure (AFFwB): A Retrospective Report of 21 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Expert Perspective: How, When, and Why to Potentially Stop Antiresorptive Drugs in Osteoporosis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to compare the extent of bone turnover suppression between patients with atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and osteoporotic hip fractures (typical femur fractures, TFFs) using a one-to-one matching strategy. A single-center retrospective comparison of females aged ≥ 60 years who underwent operative treatment for AFFs and TFFs between January 2010 and March 2021 was conducted. Demographic characteristics and clinical data including fracture site, past medical history, bone mineral density (BMD), bisphosphonate (BP) medication history, and serum bone turnover marker (BTM) levels were examined. Moreover, we performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the risk factors for AFFs and a one-to-one matched-pair analysis to compare various BTMs. Overall, 336 consecutive females were included: 113 with AFFs and 213 with TFFs. The mean age, BMI, and lowest BMD T-score were 78.6 years, 22.8 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.