Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39199544›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Combined Fluorescence-Guided Surgery with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Fluorescein in Glioblastoma: Technical Description and Report of 100 Cases.

Alessandro Pesaresi, Pietro La Cava, Marta Bonada, Pietro Zeppa, Antonio Melcarne, Fabio Cofano, Pietro Fiaschi, Diego Garbossa, Andrea Bianconi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Assessment of cognitive load in the context of neurosurgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alessandro PesaresiNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4632-1710
Pietro La CavaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Marta BonadaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Pietro ZeppaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-3621
Antonio MelcarneNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Fabio CofanoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Pietro FiaschiDivision of Neurosurgery, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-5524
Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-7133
Andrea BianconiNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Via Cherasco 15, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-0731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluorescence-guided resection (FGR) of glioblastomas has been previously explored with the use of 5-amivelulinic acid (5-ALA) and sodium fluoresceine (SF), allowing us to maximize the extent of resection (EoR). In this study, we highlight the most relevant concerns regarding this technique and present the methods and results from the experience of our center.

methodsA case series of 100 patients operated on in AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza in Turin with a histological diagnosis of glioblastoma (grade IV, according to WHO 2021) was retrospectively analyzed. Both 5-ALA and SF were administered and intraoperatively assessed with an optical microscope.

results5-ALA is the only approved drug for FGR in glioblastoma, reporting an increased EoR. Nevertheless, SF can be positively used in addition to 5-ALA to reduce the risk of false positives without increasing the rate of adverse effects. In our experience, SF was used to guide the initial phase of resection while 5-ALA was used to visualize tumor spots within the surgical cavity. In 96% of cases, gross total resection was achieved, with supra-maximal resection in 11% of cases.

conclusionsCombined FGR using 5-ALA and SF seems to be a promising method of increasing the extent of resection and to improving the prognosis in glioblastoma patients.

Indexed as

aminolevulinic acidfluoresceinfluorescenceglioblastomagliomamaximal safe resection

Identifiers

PMID39199544
PMCPMC11353032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.