Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39199726›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Enhancing Trauma Care: A Machine Learning Approach with XGBoost for Predicting Urgent Hemorrhage Interventions Using NTDB Data.

Jin Zhang, Zhichao Jin, Bihan Tang, Xiangtong Huang, Zongyu Wang, Qi Chen, Jia He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jin ZhangSchool of Health Sciences and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China.
Zhichao JinDepartment of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Bihan TangDepartment of Health Management, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xiangtong HuangSchool of Health Sciences and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China.
Zongyu WangSchool of Health Sciences and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China.
Qi ChenDepartment of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Jia HeSchool of Health Sciences and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3107201National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3107202Shanghai Emerging Cross Disciplinary Research Project 2022JC011Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by China Association for Science and Technology 2022-JCJQ-QT-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTrauma is a leading cause of death worldwide, with many incidents resulting in hemorrhage before the patient reaches the hospital. Despite advances in trauma care, the majority of deaths occur within the first three hours of hospital admission, offering a very limited window for effective intervention. Unfortunately, a significant increase in mortality from hemorrhagic trauma is primarily due to delays in hemorrhage control. Therefore, we propose a machine learning model to predict the need for urgent hemorrhage intervention.

methodsThis study developed and validated an XGBoost-based machine learning model using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2017 to 2019. It focuses on demographic and clinical data from the initial hours following trauma for model training and validation, aiming to predict whether trauma patients require urgent hemorrhage intervention.

resultsThe XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance across multiple datasets, achieving an AUROC of 0.872 on the training set, 0.869 on the internal validation set, and 0.875 on the external validation set. The model also showed high sensitivity (77.8% on the external validation set) and specificity (82.1% on the external validation set), with an accuracy exceeding 81% across all datasets, highlighting its high reliability for clinical applications.

conclusionsOur study shows that the XGBoost model effectively predicts urgent hemorrhage interventions using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). It outperforms other machine learning algorithms in accuracy and robustness across various datasets. These results highlight machine learning's potential to improve emergency responses and decision-making in trauma care.

Indexed as

hemorrhagemachine learningNational Trauma Data Banktraumaurgent interventionXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID39199726
PMCPMC11352089

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.