ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Constructing a Clinical Patient Similarity Network of Gastric Cancer.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the Understanding of the Concept of Patient Similarity in Cancer Research and Treatment: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Liver Cancer: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Integrated Therapeutic Approaches.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesClinical molecular genetic testing and molecular imaging dramatically increase the quantity of clinical data. Combined with the extensive application of electronic health records, a medical data ecosystem is forming, which calls for big-data-based medicine models. We tried to use big data analytics to search for similar patients in a cancer cohort, showing how to apply artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to clinical data processing to obtain clinically significant results, with the ultimate goal of improving healthcare management.
methodsIn order to overcome the weaknesses of most data processing algorithms that rely on expert labeling and annotation, we uniformly adopted one-hot encoding for all types of clinical data, calculating the Euclidean distance to measure patient similarity and subgrouping via an unsupervised learning model. Overall survival (OS) was investigated to assess the clinical validity and clinical relevance of the model.
resultsWe took gastric cancers (GCs) as an example to build a high-dimensional clinical patient similarity network (cPSN). When performing the survival analysis, we found that Cluster_2 had the longest survival rates, while Cluster_5 had the worst prognosis among all the subgroups. As patients in the same subgroup share some clinical characteristics, the clinical feature analysis found that Cluster_2 harbored more lower distal GCs than upper proximal GCs, shedding light on the debates.
conclusionOverall, we constructed a cancer-specific cPSN with excellent interpretability and clinical significance, which would recapitulate patient similarity in the real-world. The constructed cPSN model is scalable, generalizable, and performs well for various data types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.