ArticleBiomedicines2024
Rotenone and Its Derivative, Rotenoisin A, Induce Neurodegeneration Differentially in SH-SY5Y Cells.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR-495-3p Attenuates Neuronal Apoptosis Through The Activation of Wnt/MAPK Pathways in Ischemic Stroke.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Ionizing Radiation-Induced Structural Modification of Isoegomaketone and Its Anti-Inflammatory Activity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rotenone (ROT), the most significant rotenoid, which has shown anticancer activity, has also been reported to be toxic to normal cells, inducing Parkinson's disease (PD)-like neuronal loss with aggregation of α-synuclein (α-syn). To reduce the adverse effects of ROT, its derivative, rotenoisin A (ROA), is obtained by directly irradiating a ROT solution in methanol using γ-rays, which has been reported for potential anticancer properties. However, its PD-inducing effects have not yet been researched or reported. This study sought to compare the activities of ROA and ROT on the aggregation of α-syn, apoptosis, and autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells. ROA decreased cell survival less when compared with ROT on SH-SY5Y cells at 48 h in a dose-dependent manner. ROT (0.5 and 1 μM) and ROA (4 and 5 μM) decreased the expression of tyrosine hydroxylase. Western blot analysis of the Triton X-100 insoluble fraction revealed that both ROT and ROA significantly increased the levels of oligomeric, dimeric, and monomeric phosphorylated Serine129 α-syn and total monomeric α-syn. Moreover, both compounds decreased the proportion of neuronal nuclei, the neurofilament-heavy chain, and β3-tubulin. The phosphorylation of ERK and SAPK were reduced, whereas ROA did not act on Akt. Additionally, the increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio further activated the downstream caspases cascade. ROT promoted the LC3BII/I ratio and p62 levels; however, different ROA doses resulted in different effects on autophagy while inducing PD-like impairments in SH-SY5Y cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.