ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Using an Empathetic Approach to Explore Technology Readiness and Needs for Digital Services to Assist People with Dementia.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting older adults smart healthcare adoption using an extended TAM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This qualitative study investigates technology readiness, i.e., self-management, social support, and digital health literacy, in people with dementia (PwD). PwD are difficult to recruit; therefore, we used an empathic approach to recruit and conduct interviews. The interviews with seven participants with dementia and two informal caregivers, guided by the READHY framework, reveal nuanced insights into their experiences. Participants demonstrate varying degrees of self-management, with informal caregivers playing pivotal roles in facilitating activities and supporting overall well-being. Cognitive challenges, such as concentration and communication difficulties, are prevalent, highlighting the importance of robust support systems. Internal and external support networks significantly influence social integration, yet societal misconceptions impede inclusion, exacerbating feelings of isolation for both participants and caregivers. Limited interaction with technology is observed, primarily reliant on caregivers for assistance. Technology may hold potential for enhancing independence and alleviating caregiver burden. As an empathetic approach eased recruitment and communication with PwD, we recommend using this approach for future studies to include participants who otherwise would not be recruited. Given that the number of participants in this study is limited to only seven PwD with moderate to severe cognitive impairment, further investigation using mixed methods, including the READHY framework, and a larger number of participants is needed to examine the generalizability of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.